首页> 外文OA文献 >Non-Cash Auction for Spectrum Trading in Cognitive Radio Networks: A Contract Theoretical Model with Joint Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard
【2h】

Non-Cash Auction for Spectrum Trading in Cognitive Radio Networks: A Contract Theoretical Model with Joint Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard

机译:认知无线电网络中频谱交易的非现金拍卖:a   具有联合逆向选择和道德风险的契约理论模型

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In cognitive radio networks (CRNs), spectrum trading is an efficient way forsecondary users (SUs) to achieve dynamic spectrum access and to bring economicbenefits for the primary users (PUs). Existing methods requires full paymentfrom SU, which blocked many potential "buyers", and thus limited the PU'sexpected income. To better improve PUs' revenue from spectrum trading in a CRN,we introduce a financing contract, which is similar to a sealed non-cashauction that allows SU to do a financing. Unlike previous mechanism designs inCRN, the financing contract allows the SU to only pay part of the total amountwhen the contract is signed, known as the down payment. Then, after thespectrum is released and utilized, the SU pays the rest of payment, known asthe installment payment, from the revenue generated by utilizing the spectrum.The way the financing contract carries out and the sealed non-cash auctionworks similarly. Thus, contract theory is employed here as the mathematicalframework to solve the non-cash auction problem and form mutually beneficialrelationships between PUs and SUs. As the PU may not have the fullacknowledgement of the SU's financial status, nor the SU's capability in makingrevenue, the problems of adverse selection and moral hazard arise in the twoscenarios, respectively. Therefore, a joint adverse selection and moral hazardmodel is considered here. In particular, we present three situations wheneither or both adverse selection and moral hazard are present during thetrading. Furthermore, both discrete and continuous models are provided in thispaper. Through extensive simulations, we show that the adverse selection andmoral hazard cases serve as the upper and lower bounds of the general casewhere both problems are present.
机译:在认知无线电网络(CRN)中,频谱交易是次级用户(SU)实现动态频谱访问并为主要用户(PU)带来经济利益的有效途径。现有方法要求SU提供全额付款,这阻止了许多潜在的“购买者”,从而限制了PU的预期收入。为了更好地提高PU在CRN中通过频谱交易获得的收入,我们引入了融资合同,该合同类似于允许SU进行融资的密封非现金拍卖。与CRN中以前的机制设计不同,融资合同允许SU在签订合同时仅支付总金额的一部分,即预付款。然后,频谱释放并使用后,SU从利用频谱所产生的收入中支付其余的付款,即分期付款。融资合同的执行方式和密封的非现金拍卖行也是如此。因此,这里采用合同理论作为数学框架,以解决非现金拍卖问题并在PU和SU之间形成互惠关系。由于PU可能没有充分了解SU的财务状况,也没有SU的收款能力,因此在两种情况下分别出现逆向选择和道德风险问题。因此,这里考虑了共同的逆向选择和道德风险模型。特别是,当交易期间出现逆向选择和道德风险或同时存在时,我们提出了三种情况。此外,本文提供了离散模型和连续模型。通过广泛的模拟,我们表明不利选择和道德风险案件是同时存在两个问题的一般案件的上限和下限。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号